Guy Ritchie's 'King Arthur: Legends Of The Sword' Flops At The Box Office

May 15, 2017
Originally published on May 15, 2017 4:40 pm
Copyright 2017 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

The mythology of King Arthur has all the ingredients for a hit blockbuster movie - magic, romance, shirtless guys with muscles swinging swords. Guy Ritchie's newest take on the story is "King Arthur: Legend Of The Sword," and it's not good. That's one of the kinder ways of putting it. That's why it may end up losing money at the box office. NPR's Andrew Limbong explains.

ANDREW LIMBONG, BYLINE: In "King Arthur: Legend Of The Sword," Charlie Hunnam plays Arthur with a touch of bad boy cockiness.

(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, "KING ARTHUR: LEGEND OF THE SWORD")

CHARLIE HUNNAM: (As Arthur) I see what you're doing. You're trying to get me to do something razzle-dazzle with that sword.

LIMBONG: But it wasn't quite enough charisma to save the movie. Variety called it loud and obnoxious. Vulture headlined their review with the words formulaic and dumb. Newsday said it was an unsuccessful mix of saucy wit and portentous sorcery. Now, movies can get bad reviews and still do well in ticket sales, but this one didn't.

ANTHONY D'ALESSANDRO: It's a big bomb. There have been bigger, but it's a big bomb.

LIMBONG: That's Anthony D'Alessandro. He covers the box office for Deadline.

D'ALESSANDRO: Sources say it could lose anywhere from 150 to over 200 million.

LIMBONG: That's dollars we're talking. According to the site Box Office Mojo, "King Arthur" made $14.7 million this weekend domestically, just a fraction of its big studio budget. That puts it in the same company as other recent flops like "The Lone Ranger" or "47 Ronin."

D'ALESSANDRO: And then there was "John Carter Of Mars," which actually lost more money at 306 million.

LIMBONG: "King Arthur" doesn't have a history of killing it at the box office.

DORSEY ARMSTRONG: I challenge you to find another figure from literature that is as well-known and as popular throughout time and around the world as "Arthur" is.

LIMBONG: That's Dorsey Armstrong, professor of medieval literature at Purdue University and editor in chief of the academic journal Arthuriana. Dorsey says the inherent bigness of the "Arthur" canon is what makes it so difficult to put into film.

ARMSTRONG: There are so many different Arthurs that I don't think it's ever possible to please everybody.

LIMBONG: Think of the super stern Clive Owen interpretation from 2004...

(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, "KING ARTHUR")

CLIVE OWEN: (As Arthur) And it would be good for you to mark my face, Saxon, for the next time you see it, it will be the last thing you see on this Earth.

LIMBONG: ...Or Sean Connery's more regal take.

(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, "FIRST KNIGHT")

SEAN CONNERY: (As King Arthur) I am Arthur of Camelot, and I command you now all to fight. Fight.

LIMBONG: Dorsey says there was one movie that really nailed it, though.

(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, "MONTY PYTHON AND THE HOLY GRAIL")

JOHN CLEESE: (As The Black Knight) I move for no man.

GRAHAM CHAPMAN: (As King Arthur) So be it.

ARMSTRONG: The best King Arthur movie is "Monty Python And The Holy Grail."

(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, "MONTY PYTHON AND THE HOLY GRAIL")

CHAPMAN: (As King Arthur) Now stand aside, worthy adversary.

CLEESE: (As The Black Knight) Tis but a scratch.

CHAPMAN: (As King Arthur) A scratch - your arm's off.

CLEESE: (As The Black Knight) No, it isn't.

CHAPMAN: (As King Arthur) Well, what's that, then?

CLEESE: (As The Black Knight) I've had worse.

LIMBONG: Andrew Limbong, NPR News.

(SOUNDBITE OF REAL ESTATE SONG, "DARLING") Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.